A lot of known free and commercial products are based on those HaldCLUTs sources. Īwesome LUTs made by talented people based on real film stocks. Here it is! G'MIC and RawTherapee Film Simulation LUTs converted to. I am thinking to release large unified G'MIC and RawTherapee pack of x33 and 圆5 sized. Original RawTherapee HaldCLUTs can be directly downloaded here: ![]() RawTherapee Film Simulation Collection last version is still Original G'MIC HaldCLUTs can be directly downloaded here: But those LUTs are still different from RawTherapee. Seems they fix a lot of color banding and gamma clipping in many LUTs. I noticed that G'MIC updated Color Presets and Simulate Film Filters Collection at. Thanks for confirming that, your input is much appreciated and now we know Rawtherapee handles that in a different way. Testing in Resolve and comparing the profiles obtained with the equivalent LUT's from Fernando's pack (and mine) it is clear that they have been 'modified' somewhat - generally higher contrast.Īs you noted Dmitry, the Raw Therapy HaldCLUT png's are also higher resolution (1728 x 1728) than the 'original' G'MIC files (512 x 512) and the IWLTBAP-converted CUBE LUT files are way larger (79.7 MB vs 7.0 MB). In theory, the higher the Image Level, the greater the precision, but if the RawTherapee HaldCLUT's were (as assumed) derived from the originals, with some modifications along the way, I can't see that would make the transforms any more precise.ĭid just that: downloaded the Raw Therapy pack and converted some of the HaldCLUT files to CUBE LUT's in like manner. Which makes the 'original' G'MIC (512) images, Level 8: As I learn, the 'Image Level' is the cube root of the resolution and equals the number of columns. Testing in Resolve and comparing the profiles obtained with the equivalent LUT's from Fernando's pack (and mine) it is clear that the original have been 'modified' somewhat - generally higher contrast.Īlso, as you noted Dmitry, the Raw Therapy HaldCLUT png's are higher resolution (1728 x 1728) than the 'original' G'MIC files (512 x 512) and the IWLTBAP-converted CUBE LUT files are way larger (79.7 MB vs 7.0 MB).īeyond that, I can't really comment having never used Raw Therapy and knowing next to nothing about the complexities of 3D LUT's.Įdit: According to the ReadMe.txt in the RawTherapee (not Raw Therapy ) pack, the HaldCLUT.pngs are Image Level 12, sRGB, 8bits/channel. I also found that different software may convert HaldCLUT to CUBE in slightly different way.ĭid that: downloaded the Raw Therapy pack and converted some of the HaldCLUT files to CUBE LUT's in like manner with the IWLTBAP-LUT generator. It seems that pack based on similar source but uses more complicated contrast curves and higher resolution. I can also suggest to download and convert to cube LUT pack from RawTherapy app. I tried to make a 16-bit PNG HaldCLUT from within Rawtherapee, but the resulting PNG is huge (about 12MB).Dmitry Shijan wrote:P.S. My question is, to share this work as presets with the community, should I just share pp3 files, or make HaldCLUTs? I tried first to emulate the Classic Chrome preset, and I think I got something pretty close to what the in-camera development produces. ![]() Then I can load the raw file with neutral preset, check “Tone curve” and “Look Table” From the DCP profile in color Management, and work with L* curve, LH, HH, SH and VH equalizers to tweak the levels, contrast and colors. Hi and Std, and the different monochrome versions). To achieve this goal, I took shot a ColorChecker in raw+jpeg fine, going through each color preset from my Fujifilm X-T1 (Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, PRO Neg. ![]() I’m trying to emulate the Fujifilm Film simulation presets for use with Rawtherapee.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |